A Maze of Perspectives
Truth in a World of Lies
In today's world of instant information, it is easy to get swept up in a sea of half-truths and distortions.
This is particularly evident in the realm of politics, where lies and misconceptions obscure an accurate view of many important aspects of American culture, such as the separation of church and state, the influence of The Bible on politics, and the principles upon which America was founded.
It is therefore more important than ever to debunk these lies and misconceptions, to gain a deeper understanding of these topics and their relevance to American life.
So join us as we unveil the truth behind these lies, shed much-needed light on the complexities and nuances of these controversial topics, and together strive for a more informed and enlightened society.
The Paperback and eBook — Available Now
In an age marked by conflicting accounts and complex ideologies, the truth is often obscured beneath layers of political controversy. As curious and determined individuals, we find ourselves navigating through a maze of perspectives, each vying for our attention and allegiance. This realization has sparked a curiosity in me to peel back the layers and examine the realities that lie beneath the surface. Understanding this dynamic has triggered a sense of responsibility in me—one that urges me to challenge dominant narratives and to become an advocate for truth in a world where lies so easily prevail.
From the Front Cover
Unveil the truth obscured by the many misconceptions about the most important aspects of American culture.
A Preview
The idea of separating church and state originated in the intellectual activity of 17th- and 18th-century Western Europe and the experiences of early American colonists. Many sought to escape religious persecution, and as a result, the First Amendment of the Constitution was enacted. It states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” This simple but explicit clause ensures that government remains neutral in religious matters while simultaneously protecting everyone’s rights to practice their own beliefs freely.
The concept of the separation of church and state is deeply rooted in modern society, but understanding its historical foundations reveals a fascinating and complex journey. At its core, this principle insists that religious institutions and government operate independently of one another, in order to, as George Washington put it, “establish effectual barriers against the horrors of spiritual tyranny, and every species of religious persecution.”
However, this idea of the separation of church and state wasn’t always a given; it evolved through many centuries of philosophical debate, conflict, and cultural shifts that reflected society’s changing views on religion, governance, and individual rights. To trace the roots of this concept, we need to look to a pivotal period of intellectual activity in Western Europe, when thinkers like John Locke, Voltaire, and Montesquieu began to champion the idea of religious freedom.
Locke argued that faith should be a personal choice, wholly separate from governmental influence, and that coercing individuals in matters of belief was unjust. At the time, this was a radical departure from the prevailing view where church and state were typically intertwined, with rulers vigorously enforcing religious conformity.
Voltaire argued that when governments imposed religious conformity upon their population this inevitably led to conflict and religious wars. Such societies were rampant with corruption and stagnation because dissent was suppressed. This led Voltaire to conclude that rather than impose conformity and control, only freedom and diversity would create vibrant, peaceful societies.
Montesquieu famously advocated for civil liberty that could only be assured through a separation of governmental powers, the right to fair trials, the presumption of innocence, and the freedom of thought, speech, and assembly.
In this way, such thinking—which formed the backbone of what came to be known as the Age of the Enlightenment—paved the way for people to question the traditional authority of monarchs and religious leaders, and set the stage for later developments in the United States.
Fast forward to the late 18th century in America where the Founding Fathers were influenced by these Enlightenment ideas. Many of them, like James Madison and Thomas Jefferson, held a vision of a new nation where government wouldn’t interfere with personal beliefs. As Madison described it: “The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.” Jefferson famously spoke of a “wall of separation” between church and state, a phrase that encapsulates the idea that no one should impose their beliefs on someone else. It was a revolutionary vision that helped shape the First Amendment of the Constitution, which guarantees freedom of religion.
Today, the separation of church and state is often a hot topic, especially when arguing about the presence of religious symbols in public spaces or the role of faith in American politics. On one hand, many argue that this principle protects individual freedom of expression, ensuring that no one is censored when professing their religious beliefs. On the other hand, some see it as a call to completely eradicate any and all expressions of religious faith in public or political life. As such, this ongoing debate shows that while the idea of separating church and state was truly revolutionary, the question of how to apply it is still something that remains firmly at the heart of American cultural life.
Story Continues Below
To watch author and historian W. Kent Smith discuss the contents of his book On Earth as It is On Heaven, at the Sacred Word Revealed Conference ’23, hosted by Zen Garcia, CLICK BELOW.
Story Continues From Above
An Exclusive Offer of Lies My Professor Told Me
Available on this Website
Lodestar Cinema Creations and W. Kent Smith are proud to present the book entitled Lies My Professor Told Me: Questions Concerning the Original Vision of the Founding Fathers. Although the book is available worldwide on Amazon Books, we are also offering them through our website here at The Lost Stories Channel so we can pass along a savings off the suggested retail price.
Lies My Professor Told Me is available as a Paperback on Amazon Books for $19.99, but here on The Lost Stories Channel, you can get a brand-new copy of it for just $16.99, in the drop-down list below. An eBook companion is also available on Amazon for $9.99, or through this website for just $6.99, in the drop-down list below.
Thanks for your interest, and enjoy the journey! And if you like what you read, please tell others about the book by posting a positive review on the various websites where it’s available, on Amazon Books and Sacred Word Publishing.
More Previews of Lies My Professor Told Me
To Read Further, Go To:
WEB OF LIES—to see how the narratives we consume are often curated to evoke responses that may only benefit those in power.
INHERITED IGNORANCE—to learn that, the highest glory of the American Revolution was how it connected the principles of civil government and Christianity.
THE BROKEN MACHINE—to discover that, looking at American history, the Founders never intended to remove The Bible and its teachings from our political life.
THE MYTH OF PURE DEMOCRACY—to find that, as the Founders saw it, government based on purely democratic rule was a step away from “tyranny of the majority.”
THE MEDIA MIRAGE—to see that, the time to guard against corruption and tyranny is before they have gotten hold of us.
DIVIDE AND CONQUER—to find that, there is scarcely an action on our part whose motives are not subject to a double interpretation.
THE PUPPET MASTERS—to see that, the best way of doing good to the poor is not to make them easy in poverty but to lead them out of it.
TAKING FROM THE RICH—to learn that, to compel someone to contribute money to promote opinions for which they disbelieve is sinful and tyrannical.
