The Book of Days
The Academia.edu Book Chat
The Book of Days: In Search of the 5,500-year Prophecy Given to Adam About the Coming of Christ
“Did a 5,500-year prophecy, supposedly given to Adam, precisely foretell the coming of Christ? And: Is our usual biblical chronology—that of 4,000 years from Adam to Jesus—accurate? Smith presents a ton of evidence—biblical texts, apocryphal writings, ancient artifacts, even the dimensions of the Ark of the Covenant—that suggest there was a prophecy of 5 1/2 days. And each day equals 1,000 years: so 5,500 years from Adam to Christ… Smith claims this timeline isn’t just some strange footnote; it was actually mainstream for the early church, and sources like The Septuagint support this 5,500-year view. Only later, after much political and theological wrangling, did the West lose this idea and settle on the shorter chronology… And that matters because, for Smith, the 5,500-year prophecy isn’t just a number game. He sees it as proof that God is faithful, keeping promises across millennia, whereas the 4,000-year model doesn’t match the prophecies at all… The big takeaway is: Smith doesn’t just want you to see a different ledger of years. He’s asking us to reflect on how tradition, power, and forgotten texts shape our sense of sacred history and how sometimes, what’s been left out of history is as important as what’s stayed in…”
To hear Academia.edu’s entire book chat about The Book of Days, CLICK BELOW.
To read along with the audio, SCROLL DOWN to see the transcript.
To learn more about Academia.edu’s work and mission, CLICK HERE.
The Academia.edu Book Chat Transcript
HER: The paper we’re diving into today is The Book of Days: In Search of the 5,500-year Prophecy Given to Adam About the Coming of Christ by W. Kent Smith. It’s a bit of a mouthful, but, wow, there’s a lot going on in here.
HIM: I know, right? Just the title alone sets up a big, ambitious premise. At its core, this paper is asking: Did a 5,500-year prophecy, supposedly given to Adam, precisely foretell the coming of Christ? And, actually: Is our usual biblical chronology—what most people think is 4,000 years from Adam to Jesus—even accurate?
HER: Exactly. That’s really the heart of it. The author argues that the familiar 4,000-year biblical genealogy is, well, off the mark. Instead, he presents a ton of evidence—biblical texts, apocryphal writings, ancient artifacts, even the dimensions of the Ark of the Covenant—that suggest there was a prophecy of 5 1/2 days. And each day equals 1,000 years: so 5,500 years from Adam to Christ.
HIM: What’s fascinating is that Smith claims this timeline isn’t just some strange footnote. He says it was actually mainstream for the early church. Like, several Church Fathers, and sources like The Septuagint, the Greek Old Testament, supported this 5,500-year view. Only later, after a bunch of political and theological wrangling, did the West kind of lose this idea and settle on the shorter chronology.
HER: Right. And Smith spends a lot of time on how certain books were cut from, or ignored by, the official canon—books like The First Book of Adam and Eve, Enoch, even Jubilees. He’s not saying these were lost everywhere, just that they kind of faded in the West, while in Eastern Christianity, some traditions still kept them in circulation.
HIM: The argument is almost as much about how history gets written and rewritten, as it is about any specific timeline. Smith is pretty clear. He wants readers to be skeptical about why we accept some timelines or texts and reject others. It’s a reminder that what we think of as The Bible is shaped by a lot of decisions and a fair bit of politics.
HER: And that matters because, for Smith, the 5,500-year prophecy isn’t just a number game. He sees it as proof that God is faithful, keeping promises across millennia. For him, the longer chronology makes the arrival of Christ not just meaningful, but also demonstrably on time. Whereas with the 4,000-year model, he’d say it doesn’t match the prophecies at all.
HIM: I mean, whether you’re persuaded by the evidence or not, he’s got this point about typology, how biblical events and even artifacts like the measurements of The Ark of the Covenant supposedly echo or foreshadow the coming Messiah. Honestly, reading it, I wondered if people will buy that some random cubit measurement means Jesus was always going to show up at such and such a year. But he does make you question what counts as evidence in the first place.
HER: That’s the big takeaway for readers, I think. This paper doesn’t just want you to see a different ledger of years. It’s a call to reflect on how tradition, power, and forgotten texts shape our sense of sacred history. And to notice that what counts as truth is often less fixed than we’d like. You don’t have to agree, but he’s inviting you to wrestle with it.
HIM: Totally. And honestly, it reminds me of trying to follow family recipes. Like, is Grandma’s version the real one? Or did Uncle Bob sneak in a different ingredient when no one was looking?
HER: Ha, that’s actually a perfect analogy for biblical texts. A lot of ingredients, some left out or swapped, and everyone’s sure theirs is the right mix.
HIM: In the end, Smith’s work is more of a conversation starter than final truth. It’s a reminder that history—especially sacred history—is always up for re-examination, and that sometimes looking at what’s been left out is as important as what’s stayed in.
HER: Couldn’t agree more. And if you’re curious, Smith provides a seriously deep bibliography. You could lose a week in those footnotes alone. It’s a wild ride.
HIM: And with that, should we call it a day? Or maybe five and a half?
HER: Five and a half it is. Until next time.
Previews of The Book of Days
To read more, go to:
A CASE FOR THE BOOK—to read a work that sheds light on long-lost truths that the majority of modern Christians know nothing about.
IN OUR DARKEST HOUR—to discover God’s greatest proof of His control and faithfulness the world would ever know.
ABOUT TIME—to see that, the Advent of Christ was never something that God intended to catch humanity by surprise.
SOME FOREWORD THINKING—to learn of a tale stranger than any fiction, of the ultimate tale of God’s intention toward humanity.
THE HIDDEN BOOKS—to learn how a subject once reserved for the elite and esoteric is now open for the layperson to investigate.
SHADOW AND SUBSTANCE—to see how typology expounds that certain events, persons, or statements in The Old Testament pre-figure Christ.
A PROPHECY OF DAYS—to learn that long before the modern obsession with time, The Bible declared its importance in the plan of God.
ENOCH AS: THE GO-BETWEEN—to discover that more than any other figure in biblical history, Enoch is a bridge between The Old and New Testament.
A CAPSTONE TO TIME—to discover The Great Pyramid of Giza defies any attempt to dismiss that it might contain the ultimate expression of truth.
OF TALISMANS AND TIMELINES—to see how a string of uncanny connections demonstrates that the God of The Bible is truly the Lord of Time.
THE NEXT PARADIGM SHIFT—to see how, from time to time, there are drastic changes, where man, world, and God appear in a different light.
THE END—to discover how Enoch’s life story reveals a special truth concerning the literature that has become synonymous with his name.
